Skip to content
Essex Counts — Essex, in numbers.Local help →
Essex Counts / Council areas / Chelmsford / South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville · Chelmsford

South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville: your neighbourhood

South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

Homes rented from a council or housing association: 3% here, compared with 13% across Chelmsford (10.8 percentage points lower).

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 24.9% here, compared with 33.9% across Chelmsford (9 percentage points lower).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 65 or over: 21.3% here, compared with 19.4% across Chelmsford (1.9 percentage points higher).

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

21.3%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

1,708 out of 8,017.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

3%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

244 out of 8,017.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

8,017

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

8,017 out of 8,017.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

24.9%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

1,617 out of 6,485.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

45.5%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,491 out of 3,279.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

11.4%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

375 out of 3,279.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

35.6%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,306 out of 6,481.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

61.9%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

4,009 out of 6,481.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

1.5%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

98 out of 6,481.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

15.8%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

1,026 out of 6,485.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

16%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

517 out of 3,275.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

25.4%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,645 out of 6,481.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

3%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

83 out of 3,275.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

2.6%

21 March 2021 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

166 out of 6,481.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

548 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 330 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 28 mapped crimes in September 2024; 58 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 2024285
October 2024391
November 2024261
December 2024262
January 2025230
February 2025184
March 2025342
April 2025162
May 2025333
June 2025274
July 2025251
August 2025354
September 2025192
October 2025383
November 2025335
December 2025395
January 2026384
February 2026810
March 2026615
April 2026473
May 2026374
June 2026453
July 2026529
August 2026583
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · South Woodham-Elmwood and Woodville
CategoryMapped crimes
violent crime204
shoplifting164
public order42
criminal damage arson38
other theft26
drugs25
vehicle crime18
burglary8
other crime8
robbery6
theft from the person4
bicycle theft3
possession of weapons2
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and records without usable locations are excluded.

Do not compare directly with Scottish council-level recorded crime totals.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Chelmsford →